Migrant workers facing capital punishment in Singapore: Use alternate sentence in place of death sentence
April 7, 2012, 9:00 am
Filed under: Singapore, Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign

7 April 2012

Joint Statement

Migrant workers facing capital punishment in Singapore:
Use alternate sentence in place of death sentence

We, the undersigned civil society organizations, express our grave concern on the recent capital cases involving migrant workers in Singapore.

On 15 March 2010, Roselyn Reyes Pascua, a Filipina, was found in her room at Peony Mansion, Bencoolen Street with multiple stab wounds in the chest, abdomen, her genital area and a stab that went through her ribs into her heart, which was the fatal injury that took her life.

During his cross examination in court, Bijukumar Remadevi Nair Gopinathan, an Indian national, admitted to stabbing Ms Pascua due to “grave and sudden provocation” as she subsequently doubled the price for one hour of sex from the initially agreed amount of S$100 and refused to return him his “hard-earned” money according to reports. Gopinathan’s account was dismissed by Justice Choo Han Teck who noted in a nine-page judgment that due to the absence of defensive injury on Ms Pascua he agreed with the prosecution’s theory that Gopinathan had gone to Ms Pascua’s room to rob her.

Since Ms Pascua was unarmed, Justice Choo was not convinced that there was any basis for Gopinathan to stab her so many times. He also mentioned that because Gopinathan had, from the time of his arrest, given the police several versions of the incident, he had no hesitation in concluding that he was a totally untrustworthy witness. Gopinathan was then sentenced to the mandatory death penalty for the murder of Ms Pascua on 21 March 2012.

Similar sentences have also been imposed in the past year, mainly to low wage migrant workers. For example, twenty year old Malaysian Fabian Adiu Edwin was convicted of murder and sentenced to hang in September last year. He is one of two men from Sabah who beat up and robbed a thirty five year old Singaporean in 2008. In another case, a 32-year-old Chinese national was found guilty in September last year and given the death sentence for the murder of a taxi driver in 2009.

We are opposed to the death penalty that has been meted out to Indian national Bijukumar Remadevi Nair Gopinathan, Malaysian Fabian Adiu Edwin, and Chinese national Wang Wenfeng. Although we do not deny that these individuals have committed a grave crime and should be punished for it, we are opposed to the application of the death penalty on any individual, and for any crime for the reasons outlined below:

a) The Singapore government has argued that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to serious crimes. However, there is no reliable evidence, locally nor internationally, to show that it is any more effective than other forms of punishments. Based on numerous studies, criminologists agree that the death penalty has no deterrence value. The causes of violent crime that affect all societies are complex. Crime may be reduced through having better trained and equipped police officers, reducing poverty, improving education and implementing effective rehabilitation programmes. Executing a criminal gives the appearance of strong action being taken when in reality, does little to address why violent crimes are committed in the first place. Since the death penalty is irreversible, imposing the ultimate punishment on an individual demands that conclusive, irrefutable evidence is produced to support its use.

b) The criminal justice system is not infallible and as long as the judiciary has the death penalty, mistakes will be made and innocent people will be killed. Judges, prosecutors, and investigating officers are after all, human. For example, Taiwan’s Chiang Kuo Ching was wrongfully sentenced to death in 1997. Fresh investigations into the case after he was executed found no evidence of Chiang’s presence at the scene of the crime and established that he was tortured into making a confession. No legal system, however advanced, is
immune to miscarriages of justice. Judicial error, mistakes made in due processes, differing interpretations of the law and conviction based on ambiguous evidence are some of the possible mistakes that can be made. Inadequate legal assistance at any stage of court or investigation proceedings, especially when the person is poor and unable to hire a good lawyer are just some of the circumstances which may result in the innocent being executed.

c) Rehabilitation, not revenge should be the basis on which the justice system is built upon. In fact, the government has accepted this principle in its support and partnership with other voluntary welfare organisations of the yellow ribbon project. The continued use of the death penalty only serves to contradict the campaign message of the Yellow Ribbon Project that was launched in 2004 by former President of Singapore, Mr S R. Nathan, which seeks to advocate for society to give ex-offenders and their families a second chance, accept and support the rehabilitation and reintegration of ex-offenders into the society. The death penalty is an act of vengeance that is detrimental to building a civilized society, and demeaning to all of us as citizens. The continued use of it does not correspond to the desire for compassion, care and concern and does not give a chance for human beings to change.

In December 2007, the UN General Assembly voted 104 to 54 for a resolution on a moratorium on executions. Even though this decision is not legally binding on states, Singapore should not ignore the political significance of this resolution and the world-wide trend among nation states in abolishing the use of capital punishment.

We are cognizant that the death penalty is a ‘cruel, inhumane and degrading” punishment, and we reiterate that it should not be applied in any circumstances. We, as a society, should adopt a system where justice is meted out in a fair and humane manner. The death penalty is not acceptable and should be abolished or a moratorium applied. A moratorium will give a chance to re-examine both the purpose of the penalty and its perceived effectiveness, and can save the lives of the condemned – especially potential victims of miscarriages of justice. Let us rise above our feelings of vengeance to seek solutions. There are alternative punishments to the death penalty and we should not continue our practice of killing another human being in the name of justice or in maintaining the peace and security of our society.

List of endorsers:

1. Think Centre (TC)
2. Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign (SADPC)
3. We Believe In Second Chances
4. Humanitarian Organization For Migration Economics (HOME)

For further information please contact:

1. Sinapan Samydorai (Think Centre)
e-mail: thinkcentre@hotmail.com

2. Rachel Zeng (SADPC)
e-mail: rachelabsinthe@gmail.com

3. Kirsten Han (We Believe In Second Chances)
e-mail: kirsten@webelieveinsecondchances.org

4. Jolovan Wham (HOME)
e-mail: jolovan.home@gmail.com


10 Comments so far
Leave a comment

try doing doing drug BITCH! or even bring in drugs, we will hang u for sure and your whole family too…you are a great disgrace to woman and also to the island of singapore, go fck off somewhere and get laid by the lowest rung of the human species!

Comment by juju

Such an immature comment made here. What a disgrace to the whole of human race.

Comment by rachelabsinthe

wow! you are surely one bloody bitch to warrant such comment and following a bit of your blog; couldn’t agree more to your seeking such fame and yes, indeed a bastardize bitch! period!

Comment by anglic

Sorry I don’t see how I am seeking fame with what I do.

It is easy to hurl online insults at others under an anonymous name but it reflects heavily on your internal jealousies and bitterness. I am sorry for you, but I can understand why you, and many other Singaporeans, have become malicious beings online.

You and your friends (maybe one and the same) should stop your malicious trolling and honestly get a life, or psychological help (this coming from a person who is educated in child psychology).

The next time, try being constructive or at least intellectual yea.

Comment by rachelabsinthe

haha…a whore in singaproe talking here..you should be stoned for being such a bitch!

Comment by stibe

I will not even call you a bastard because that will be indirectly saying something about your mum. My blog is a place for intellectual discussions and sharing of opinions, not a place where you can vent your frustrations about outspoken women under your ‘anonymity’. Kindly grow up.

Comment by rachelabsinthe

rape cases, drugs cases in Singapore is on the rise, is bitch and bastardize human like you welcome such happenings! how we wish you to be a real victim of happenings such like anyone in your family to be awaiting and we are happy to see you being hanged!!NO MERCY FOR YOU BITCH!

Comment by angel awaiting

Rape cases, drug cases in Singapore is on the rise and it says a lot about the ineffectiveness of capital punishment doesn’t it?

Dear malicious troll whose name I shall not utter, why don’t you grow up or find a hobby instead of coming here with your profanities which serves no good purpose for your apparent agenda here.

Comment by rachelabsinthe


Comment by ugdan

Clones with the same IP address. 🙂

Comment by rachelabsinthe

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: